California Governor Newsom Engages in Political Calculus Ahead of Menendez Brothers Resentencing Decision

The Menendez brothers, Erik and Lyle, are moving one step closer to the possibility of freedom, as their cases advance toward a crucial parole board hearing. Their future now hinges on the assessment of the California Parole Board and ultimately, Governor Gavin Newsom’s decision regarding their eligibility for release after more than three decades in prison for the 1989 murders of their parents in Beverly Hills.

Criminal defense attorney Sam Bassett explained that the parole process will be thorough and multifaceted. “There is no doubt that Newsom is doing some political calculus on this decision,” Bassett noted, underscoring the political sensitivity of the case. The Parole Board is expected to listen to input from all stakeholders – with special attention paid to surviving family members of the victims – and to review the results of the Comprehensive Risk Assessments (CRA) conducted on both brothers. Key questions for the board will include whether Erik and Lyle have demonstrated genuine remorse and responsibility for their actions.

According to Governor Newsom, forensic psychologists have already completed risk assessments of both men. While details remain confidential, the analysis typically explores factors such as what drove the crime, the brothers’ behavior during incarceration, and the likelihood of reoffending if released. At Tuesday’s resentencing hearing, portions of these findings were presented, providing insight into the state’s evaluation of their rehabilitation.

Both Erik and Lyle have admitted to killing their parents, Mary “Kitty” and José Menendez, in what became one of the most shocking crimes of the late 20th century. Though the brothers long claimed they acted in self-defense against chronic abuse, prosecutors argued the motive was financial gain. Under California’s youthful offender law—recently amended to allow consideration for those who committed their crimes before age 26—the Menendez brothers, aged 18 and 21 at the time, have become eligible for parole.

Attorney Eric Faddis outlined several factors the Parole Board will likely consider:

• Seriousness and nature of the original crime
• Any existing criminal history prior to the murders
• Participation in rehabilitation programs and positive contributions while incarcerated
• Expressions of remorse and acceptance of accountability
• The likelihood of a stable living situation upon release
• Input and wishes of surviving family members

Faddis also emphasized, “A double homicide is about as serious as it gets.” However, he acknowledged the possibility that allegations of parental abuse may influence the board’s perception, particularly under Penal Code § 4801, which requires explicit consideration of whether the crime stemmed from the inmate’s victimization. “Many believe that such prior abuse is given much more weight now than it was in the 1990s, both legally and socially,” Faddis said.

The brothers’ parole hearing is scheduled for June 13, 2025, via video conference at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility. All known, living family members of the victims have reportedly voiced support for the brothers’ release—a unique twist in a case that has long gripped the nation.

Ultimately, the parole board’s recommendation will move to Governor Newsom, who holds the final authority. The decision will require balancing the gravity of the original crime with modern understandings of trauma, accountability, and the potential for rehabilitation. As the deliberations continue, the nation watches, awaiting an outcome in a case that has endured for over thirty years.